DOING THE TWIST -- OCCUPATION / OCCUPIED TERRITORIES: Part 4 of 7

The twisted terminology of Arabists have dominated the media for several decades and disinform children, youth and the general public via reference materials disseminated by highly respected publishers. The terms under discussion are found in online databases of Grolier, World Book, Gale, ABC-CLIO, and Facts on File. There are as well several well-known British publishers (Routledge, Encyclopedia Britannica, and Oxford University Press). Unfortunately, bias in publications from Great Britain can only be surprising in the breach. One leading indicator to a publisher’s dedication to present controversial issues in an unbiased manner is the language that is permitted, or not permitted, to be used in articles on these issues.

Following is a dissection of the terms OCCUPATION and OCCUPIED TERRITORIES, in standard use by the above-mentioned publishers, that works to delegitimize the Jewish State of Israel.

  

The territories in question are not “occupied,” since the term implies an illegal presence. The area in question is more appropriately a disputed territory. That is to say, the Arabs dispute the terms of the Mandate of Palestine, which calls for the close settlement of Jews upon the land lying between the Jordan River and the Mediterranean Sea.¹

In point of fact, the area allotted to Jewish settlement by the Balfour Declaration²  (incorporated in the Mandate of Palestine³)  included the areas referred to currently as Israel, Gaza, and the West Bank (Judea and Samaria), as well as the entire area comprising present-day Jordan.

When countries start a war and then lose, there is no law, international or otherwise, that states that the winning country must hand back to the loser lands lost in battle.⁴ Egypt started a war with Israel and lost the Sinai, but Israel later bartered it in a trade for peace with Egypt. (We’ll see how that plays out with whatever new regime emerges from the ouster of Hosni Mubarak.) Syria started a war with Israel and lost the Golan Heights. Jordan started a war with Israel and lost Judea and Samaria. No other country has ever been expected to either return land won in a defensive war or to settle the refugees of the country that lost the war. Those Arabs whose countries lost wars can either accept the rule of the winning side, or they are free to relocate to any other region or country willing to accept them. It is not Israel’s duty to provide any manner of aid. But, in fact, Israel does aid these refugees, the only perpetual refugees known in recorded history.

¹   http://www.mythsandfacts.com/conflict/mandate_for_palestine/mandate_for_palestine.htm

²   http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Balfour_Declaration_of_1917#Text_of_the_declaration       

³  http://unispal.un.org/UNISPAL.NSF/0/2FCA2C68106F11AB05256BCF007BF3CB

⁴  http://www.mythsandfacts.org/article_view.asp?articleID=153

STARTING SMALL

The following paragraph is one publisher's (ABC-CLIO) introduction to the text of UN Resolution 181 on the partition of Palestine (1947). It contains 115 words in 4 sentences on 9 lines. How bad could it be? What could go amiss? What could one possibly find offensive in such a brief statement? In a word: plenty.

United Nations: resolution on the partition of Palestine (1947)

 On November 29, 1947, the United Nations (UN) adopted this resolution, number 181, calling for the partition of the former British colony of Palestine into two separate nations: Israel for Jews and Palestine for Arabs. The effort was designed to answer calls for the establishment of a Jewish homeland, particularly after the horrors suffered by the world's Jewish population during the Holocaust. However, Palestinian Arabs adamantly rejected the UN resolution and refused to contemplate such a division of their country. Jews in the region ignored Palestinian protests and declared their portion of Palestine the independent nation of Israel in 1948, sparking the first of many Arab-Israeli wars in the second half of the 20th century. 

"United Nations: resolution on the partition of Palestine (1947)." Issues: Understanding Controversy and Society. ABC-CLIO, 2011. Web. 17 June 2011.

The first sentence is a statement of fact. From there, the direction is downhill. There is no context for the phrase “answer calls” – what calls? who called? I have no idea; do you? The second part of that sentence, “particularly after the horrors [of the] Holocaust,” suggests that the impetus to form a Jewish state was a direct result of the Holocaust. Not true. This ignores  (1) the continuous history of Jewish residence in the area, (2) the Dreyfus Affair [1894] and the Kishinev pogrom [1903] which, between them, sparked the development of the Zionist movement, (3) the Balfour Declaration of 1917, and (4) the Mandate for Palestine of 1922.

While it is true that the Arabs rejected the UN resolution, the reference to “their country” is a falsehood of the first magnitude.  The implication is that (1) all Arabs living in Palestine in 1947 were native to the area, and (2) the area was recognized as a political entity under Arab rule. Both inferences are incorrect. Many, and likely a majority, of the Arabs living in Palestine in 1947 had emigrated from other Arab lands as the Jews created infrastructure and employment opportunities. Palestine was never itself an Arab polity; the only direct rule on the land was that of the Jews prior to the fall of the Second Temple in 70 CE.

In the next sentence we read the following: “the Jews ignored Palestinian protests.” In fact, there were no “Palestinians” in 1947, other than the Jews. The Arabs were not calling themselves “Palestinians” until after the 1967 war. As for the Arab protests, according to historian Barbara W. Tuchman, “All the Arab claims of later years cannot conceal the fact that both the old Sherif Hussein and Feisal, the active leader, were cognizant of and acquiesced in the exclusion of Palestine from the area of their promised independence, whether or not they had any mental reservations. Even after the British intention to make room in Palestine for the Jews was made public they did not take exception.” [Bible and Sword, p. 329].

In the same sentence mentioned in the previous paragraph, the author refers to “their [the Palestinians’] portion of Palestine.” The Arab portion of Palestine, according to the Palestine Mandate, was east of the Jordan River (Transjordan, presently known as Jordan). In fact, the Mandate called for close settlement of Jews on the land west of the Jordan River.

The final portion of the last sentence, “sparking the first of many Arab-Israeli wars,” implies that the wars were the fault of the Jews for declaring the Jewish State of Israel in 1948. The Arabs had been slaughtering Jews in Palestine long before 1948; the year 1929 saw Arab massacres of Jews in Hebron and Safed, two of the four most holy Jewish cities in the region. In fact, the “many Arab-Israeli wars” were initiated by the Arabs, with the Israelis fighting primarily defensive actions (with the exception of preemptive actions in Gaza and Lebanon).

The publishers state that “Unlike other databases that aggregate information without context, Issues, Release 2.0 offers the complete historical background and contemporary status of each issue and also provides supporting facts, figures, and timelines.” I hope that statement reassures you!